Working on a client project last week, an unusual constraint was placed on the project. The marketing lead for the multimedia presentation dictated there be no narration on the 3 to 5 minute piece. As each creative team member pointed out how narration would be such a help in getting the message across, he would reiterate his statement, “That’s great. And maybe narration will put it over the top, but it has to work without any narration at all.”

While it seemed to be a frustrating and potentially very unnecessary constraint, there was clearly a strategic rationale for his statement.  The narration would be the last element within an incredibly time-sensitive project. The voiceover itself would be a highly variable creative element where subjective opinions about its quality or tone could completely undermine the deliverable, i.e., if the CEO didn’t ultimately like the voiceover, the whole project could fall apart at the last hour.

By imposing what seemed like a ridiculous constraint, he forced stronger, more complete performance on other creative aspects of the production. He also left the possibility of a voice over as a bonus and not a possibly vulnerable critical element. What an interesting strategy, and one worth considering when you want to protect yourself from the potentially weakest variable in your equation. – Mike Brown

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Mike Brown

Founder of The Brainzooming Group, and an expert on strategy, creativity, and innovation. Mike is a frequent speaker on innovation, strategic thinking, and social media.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterFacebookLinkedInPinterestGoogle Plus


  1. Tweets that mention Constraints Week – Constraining the Possibility of Poor Results | Brainzooming -- Topsy.com - April 27, 2010

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mike Brown and Barry Dalton, Reaburn. Reaburn said: RT @Brainzooming Protecting Yourself from Poor Results http://bit.ly/97O033 #constraints #creativity #strategy […]

  2. Innovation Strategy Lessons from Moneyball | The Brainzooming Group | Strategy Consulting and Strategic Planning - February 24, 2012

    […] Take advantage of having inferior resources to employ a dramatically different innovation […]

  3. Creativity and Innovation Lessons from Desperate Housewives | The Brainzooming Group | Strategy Consulting and Strategic Planning - March 31, 2012

    […] In a move that wound up in court with a lawsuit for wrongful termination, Marc Cherry killed off actress Nicollette Sheridan’s character unexpectedly. In court testimony, Cherry explained that amid a tight production budget, part of his consideration for the death was the salary a major character commanded could be spread across three or four actors the following season. With more actors in the creative mix, the creative story possibilities increase. What a fantastic reminder to never think you can use tight resources as an excuse to not be creative and innovative. […]

  4. Innovation Blocks-Taking the NO Out of Business InNOvation | The Brainzooming Group | Strategy Consulting and Strategic Planning - June 17, 2012

    […] constrained resources as an opportunity to spur creative thinking and […]