Forecasts and size estimates shown with multiple decimal points are scary because they invariably imply a phony level of precision. When you’re estimating something, understand up front how precise the answer has to be, and present the result accordingly.

Doing a near-term estimate for a production forecast is one thing. But if the question relates to a market’s size to gauge relative market share or reasonable long-term growth expectations, it’s probably appropriate for your answer to be a range, and maybe a pretty wide one (2x or 3x differences between the low and high end may even be reasonable).

Also, rather than investing all your efforts in one estimate, approach it with multiple methodologies or sets of inputs to create credible boundaries for your estimated range. That’s “precision” that’s more valuable than any level of phony decimal places.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Mike Brown

Founder of The Brainzooming Group, and an expert on strategy, creativity, and innovation. Mike is a frequent speaker on innovation, strategic thinking, and social media.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterFacebookLinkedInPinterestGoogle Plus

No Responses to “How Close Are We Forecasting Here?”

  1. Mike Brown - mikebrownspeaks.com says:

    Working on some new material, I found this quote which applies to today’s post:
    “There’s no sense in being precise about something when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.”
    — John von Neumann

    When the book’s written, we’ll simply roll this quote into this post ; )


  1. Project Management - 15 Techniques When Time Is Running Down | The Brainzooming Group | Strategy Consulting and Strategic Planning - March 16, 2011

    […] with “high-probability” answers (vs. waiting around for “certain” […]